剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 通念文 8小时前 :

    整体很平庸,被司机支撑着看下去,距离上次看司机的作品已经过去两年了,虽然丑但还是能让我随时都能涌上柔情和欲望是怎么回事…

  • 澄海秋 8小时前 :

    感觉为了烘托演员特意写了个品牌撕逼大传记 (不懂就问:为什么TF设计的裤衩装比pastel+brown高级?那几乎是唯一展示的设计)

  • 殳以柳 0小时前 :

    雷迪嘎嘎把一个温州潮汕女企业家形象演得活灵活现

  • 良嘉颖 8小时前 :

    看到前半小时就已经差点要骂街 alpacino都拯救不回来 全片最精彩部分的就是t台秀那个媚眼男模

  • 杨迎海 6小时前 :

    本人今年最失败的黑五投资 浪费了两个小时(剩下没浪费的睡过去了两次 想给老爷子寄甄嬛传的意思这拍了个啥啊

  • 空琼诗 0小时前 :

    似乎老头对这场狗血闹剧其实也没多大兴趣,除了冷眼旁观的视角外,十几年的跨度,情节推进草草了事,至于司机和Gaga,举手投足都不像意大利人。

  • 洲惠 0小时前 :

    第三代接班人可真是个废物➕懦夫,gaga饰演的帕特里奇亚论能力论魄力论智商哪点不比他强?懦夫无论是家族争权、还是经营企业,干啥啥不行,抛妻弃女却是第一名🥇

  • 锺新儿 6小时前 :

    ★★★☆ 其實只要對Gucci家族的故事有過了解,就知道是個充滿狗血的故事,然而Ridley Scott卻沒有拍出狗血感,整個故事不疾不徐娓娓道來,只不過,無論是愛情從星火燎原到玉石俱焚,又或是撈女從機關算盡到弄巧成拙,都更偏向Lady GaGa視角,第三幕突然轉向Adam Driver視角就有些脫線了,也導致最後買兇殺夫的動機不夠,可惜了。

  • 蛮初雪 3小时前 :

    6.5分。2个半小时,看完后我的第一感觉是:??怎么了??结束了???这纯粹就是在报流水账吧??嘎嘎的角色应该是最出彩的,但实际看下来观感并不太好,或者说作为传说中的“黑寡妇”,电影拍摄得太平淡了。亚当扮演的死者,这个角色的转变也是我关心的重点,但这次他真的没演好,整个故事从希望中开始,从失望中结束。看看老雷的岁数,哎。。。。

  • 阚晟睿 4小时前 :

    三星,故事讲的没什么特色也没什么硬伤。冲着卡司们的努力再给一星,越看嘎嘎美就觉得司机丑,莱托少爷的每个出场都承包了我的笑点,帕西诺老成那样了还是个帅老头。

  • 运华 2小时前 :

    6.5分。2个半小时,看完后我的第一感觉是:??怎么了??结束了???这纯粹就是在报流水账吧??嘎嘎的角色应该是最出彩的,但实际看下来观感并不太好,或者说作为传说中的“黑寡妇”,电影拍摄得太平淡了。亚当扮演的死者,这个角色的转变也是我关心的重点,但这次他真的没演好,整个故事从希望中开始,从失望中结束。看看老雷的岁数,哎。。。。

  • 贲佳悦 8小时前 :

    两星电影,一星服化,是怎么能把这么抓马的故事拍得这么流水账的啊

  • 芃俊 1小时前 :

    2.5;人物前后的行为逻辑是不自洽的,几处重要的时间节点都处理得十分生硬。更像是一幕一幕独立的流水账演绎,甚至还不如直接割裂成独立的短篇呢。Gaga的演绎我觉得整体还是到位的,Driver不知道怎么回事,完全没有他在《婚姻故事》和《帕特森》里的所展现的演技了。

  • 茅采绿 0小时前 :

    这部电影拍得实在是味同嚼蜡,很难看下去都......

  • 茜桃 8小时前 :

    看着看着就忘记是在看电影了,创造一个百年屹立不倒的大品牌太不容易,甚至是用鲜血铺路。

  • 解灵萱 9小时前 :

    Gaga应该去演Donatella,Gucci黑寡妇让开云老板娘亲自上阵,然后再请Lana Del Rey出演神婆Pina,或者找Florence Welch。

  • 漫文耀 9小时前 :

    一开口,听到意大利味儿的英语,就知道大事不妙

  • 西门芮优 6小时前 :

    雷老水准还是在的,只是习惯了他热爱探索人性的风格,却没想到只讲了一个没什么深度的一地鸡毛的故事。鳖女士演这种trying to hard角色还是很合适的,因为她演技就是如此。司机演窝囊废驾轻就熟了已经,下次走出舒适区演个伟光正吧。

  • 沈香巧 6小时前 :

    题材很刺激,凶杀爱情豪门时尚人性,可惜这些元素倒是完全没体现出来,平淡如水,平淡如水,人物的塑造也很有问题,完全是片段式的,连不起来。

  • 翦曼珠 2小时前 :

    这是一坨什么玩意,这么丰富的故事,这么多大牌明星,拍成了如此寡淡无聊的模样,也是挺厉害的。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved