A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
法律是块冰铁，好人也受累。
残酷，太残酷了，地球社会对待前科犯如此残酷，一些信任都不给你，只要犯了错坐了牢你就是永远有罪，谁关心你是什么原因实际上又是什么原因，根本没人在乎真相，不知道是法官有意为之还是警探办案不力刚好脑子进水让小孩姐姐顶罪蒙冤入狱。换我，我也不信任前科犯，换我，小孩犯罪我也想办法顶罪，太残酷了，太残酷了！
SB的毁容之作，居然连提名都没有，这都评的啥啊。
2021年12月25日观看。桑德拉演的很好，情绪拿捏到位。
①是有机会成为一部优秀剧情片的，可惜剧本问题多多。试举几例：警长的大儿子一开始是理性男，力劝小儿子不要去找刚出狱女主的麻烦，但和女主见了一面，只因女主说要重新开始生活，就立刻180度转弯，要报仇雪恨？20年了，出事时还是小屁孩的他们，如此大仇有足够说服力吗？②真相到结尾才告诉观众：是女主五岁的妹妹开的枪，女主为她顶罪服刑20年，合理吗？妹妹当时年龄尚小，请问顶罪有何意义？③对女主有好感的男同事这条线，缘何不了了之？④大儿子被小儿子戴了绿帽，盛怒之下就去绑架了女主的「妹妹」？这样的情感转移合理吗？绑架之后电话把女主叫来，大儿子的诉求是什么？当女主面干掉「妹妹」？那自己铁定牢狱之灾，这叫报复吗？……bug太多使得情节的合理性很成问题，更重要的是，人物的性格都没法立起来，明显是为了情节的走向，硬掰人物行为。
本来想看的是另一部…但是这部也不错 女主的演技也很好 有反转是在意料之中 亮点就是后面女主和妹妹的拥抱 亲情真的伟大，人间也还是有真情在，支撑女主走到最后
幸好，因为他 她 他 她。。。的一意善念，才没让这世间的悲剧一个接着一个地发生。无比扎实的本子！导演不徐不疾地把故事展开，桑德拉·布洛克的表演依然是影后级的。
桑德拉还是那个桑德拉 多给一分是给一个在现实中永远求不到的底层人的公证
一般。真相最后才出来，姐妹情深。。跟去年的安吉丽娜朱莉的大女主电影旗鼓相当。
我不喜欢他们不使用一个真正犯罪的人做主角，内心不受罪责的煎熬使她所有的行为在观众视角都值得“原谅”，她是伟大的无辜者，剧中其他角色对她的怨言都是无端的责难——这种视角太老旧了，也并不能体现一个罪人重建生活的艰难，赎罪在她的视角里根本不存在，警长的一对儿子塑造的什么鬼，无端的怒气和怨责未免太多了吧……《海边的曼彻斯特》和《冬天的骨头》同题，却远逊于这两部。
守护什么呢。
当时说出真相不可以吗？就算妹妹开枪，也不用做牢，你们可以生活在一起不比去做20年牢香吗？
我不喜欢他们不使用一个真正犯罪的人做主角，内心不受罪责的煎熬使她所有的行为在观众视角都值得“原谅”，她是伟大的无辜者，剧中其他角色对她的怨言都是无端的责难——这种视角太老旧了，也并不能体现一个罪人重建生活的艰难，赎罪在她的视角里根本不存在，警长的一对儿子塑造的什么鬼，无端的怒气和怨责未免太多了吧……《海边的曼彻斯特》和《冬天的骨头》同题，却远逊于这两部。
为了亲爱的妹妹承担了一切也无怨言
值得奥斯卡最佳音效奖和最佳音效剪辑奖提名，和去年的《金属之声》一样声音细节音效层次感太强了！故事还是偏简单偏老套了，前面节奏太慢，后面还行。桑德拉•布洛克表演也还行，不过份量还是不够啊！
推荐，可看。
Sandra Bullock演得不錯，但電影本身就是Netflix流水片水準......
桑德拉布洛克演技太赞。这故事其实也无解，饶恕从来就是件很难的事情。
姐姐行使着母亲的责任，着实伟大，承受着生命不可承受之重
感觉有希望冲击奥斯卡，冲着布洛克的演技多给一星。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
