Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
好像baymax啊，还没有大白可爱，而且连这种故事都能安上牺牲自己拯救人类的结局，总之就是也太大白了…
【6.0】看到足球/迷影/少年回忆的主题非常期待，但看完很失望。私人向不是问题，但如此沉闷且缺乏解读空间，索伦蒂诺实在不是我的菜。仅有的亮点是对帕夏里亚姑妈的情欲，邻家老年夫人义务式的性引导，全家痛扁刻薄的姻亲，还有全球首富同行的名媛对主角说出的那句“吃屎吧”。你以为是少年春梦，现实却是冷水浇头。就像渴望名导垂青的女演员，最后当众被导演挖苦嘲讽。故事整体只是小镇风光+家族记忆+失去双亲的人生转折。有海和帕夏里亚的镜头都很美。
我想拍電影，逃避現實，因為現實很糟糕。我想去羅馬，看自己適不適合拍電影，你卻說這個城市還有很多故事，我們最終會失敗，陷入泥潭裡。大量的廣角鏡頭，對稱的構圖，述說著憂鬱男孩的生活、夢想、家庭，上帝之手究竟能否拉我們一把，無從得知。
是我看动画的眼光越挑了吗？短短15分钟就传递了两个当代年轻人的通病：从众心理和依赖社交媒体，这明明是应该用来大加讽刺的
私人化的情绪，漂亮的镜头语言，可惜无法完全做到共情，但少年是美丽的。
火车又一次代表了迷茫，至于答案，已经在片尾黑幕中的那不勒斯吹来的海风里飘荡。
3.5
索伦蒂诺的私人影像，这是属于他的《痛苦与荣耀》。关于成长和前行，关于与过去和解，关于找寻自我和接受自我，那不勒斯少年悲喜交加的成长回忆构成了故事的基础。对我来说，除了引用的费里尼的那句话，好像没有其他让我印象更为深刻的记忆点了。(摄影和构图都极为出色。
怎么会有人不喜欢索伦蒂诺 而且这些人看过几部费里尼啊
这是最好的时代，这是最坏的时代，
好久没看过这么完整这么有趣这么感动的动画了！充满了生机和能量
好久没看过这么完整这么有趣这么感动的动画了！充满了生机和能量
2、只有失去，才能长大，亲人是这样，ZC也是；
超可爱的b-bot，却映射出人类单向索取情感的自私和科技巨头只想赚钱的嘴脸哈哈哈。以及细想有点恐惧（和讽刺），以后的人类已经不需要真人朋友了，不再需要真实的生活，不再面对面交流分享，人类终于“进化”（或者被替代）成了一行行代码，实现了某种意义上的永生？
如何成为朋友
「罗马让我很失望」
那不勒斯 马拉多纳 费里尼 小姨 走私犯 美国往事
同类型题材屡见不鲜的情况下创意和剧情都不错，只是节奏有些紊乱，中段明显down了下来，不过整体还算合格的合家欢
好无聊的电影，但我真的很想去那不勒斯看看。
那是1984年的夏天，这座城市正在为马拉多纳的到来而疯狂。但人群中的一个男孩却在一夜之间发现，球场上的呐喊渐渐沦为生活的背景声，突然长大的他离乡远足，一段人生就此开启，一段回忆就此告终。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
