Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
额，感觉有点对不起这部剧的投资和宣传。。2位导演个人风格剧中都有体现。。。所以割裂感在各种角度都有体现。特效是有点跳戏，中国部队和美国部队出现的画面仿佛不是同一部电影。人物线也扁平化，都不算特别出彩。老雷公这个人物部分还不错。总体马马虎虎的电影，时间有点长，看得有点累。如果在家我肯定看不完的。
几场的战斗场面都很不错，个别镜头衔接很突兀，有些特效很拉胯
一星给题材，一星给胡军老师，一星给其他演员，一星给途中风景。还可以更好
中国电影战争场面的天花板，三个小时时长完全没让观众觉得冗长，每一个人物包括配角都形象鲜明，这几点非常可贵。但还是有《1921》相同的转场衔接生硬毛病，不知道是不是该算黄建新的锅。陈凯歌贡献了一幕名场面，拉开火车车厢，映照在朝阳下的万里长城，浪漫至极。林超贤的枪战动作戏给劲。
感动，但是小失望，三个导演1+1+1反而小于2，这个类型适合林超贤加冯小宁。
已经在影院了呜呜呜晚上二刷太感动了哭死了妆都哭瞎了
都是战斗场面，基本没有剧情，除了敬佩志愿军战士，其他我无话可说。
我们要永远记得五星红旗是用鲜血染成的，硝烟战争是血与肉的拼搏，而我们现在是没有硝烟的战斗，所以我们即使在和平时代也不应忘记增强自身本领，为自己更是为国！
有幸成为天津的首批观众，激动的心情不能平复，评价就两个字：值得，电影值得去电影院观看，演员和制作团队值得观众对他们的夸赞，伟大的志愿军精神更值得每个中国人铭记……电影是真的尊重历史，尊重感情，尊重战争。大场面大制作，小屏幕看感受不到浩大的战争场面带给人的震撼，每到战争场景时手握着拳头松不开，紧张，激动……嘴里不停的说干死他们……或许之前有对三个导演能否做一个流畅动人的作品的怀疑，有对其中某一位导演的不相信，但现在看完了整部电影，只能说多虑了。千里英勇果敢，万里倔强成长，梅生，雷爹，余从戎，平河……千万志愿军的缩影，谢谢您们付出一切，乃至生命……千玺，你小子又完成了一部高质量的作品，越来越能让我们影迷骄傲的说一句：易烊千玺是一名合格的演员，有他的电影值得去电影院看。
4分5星；中国人太他娘的不容易了！！不看不是中国人！！（美国人的部分演的好塑料 囧）1942年中途岛，咱还是小米加步枪的打游击，1950年已经正面和美帝硬杠且杠赢了，牛逼就一个字，我只说一次🐂
提前观影战争大片《长津湖》
看的点映。本来想了半天短评怎么写分怎么打，看了有些评价觉得真离谱啊，影片里的台词已经有很强的思想性了，如果因为审美差异出现不同意见和好坏评论很正常，有的恶意质疑立场的真怀疑是没动脑子想还是反装忠呢，于是被气到了。
国家强盛才能不被欺负。
战争是现实而残酷的。
2.战争场面过多，尤其是战斗机的轰炸场面，容易产生视觉疲劳
这色调真的让我反胃啊。从开头莫名其妙的混剪，一直到结尾出字幕，有闪光点吗？
欲扬先抑，先说缺点
看完电影第一印象就是直呼过瘾！是近年来最接近于史诗般的战争片了。虽然176分钟不到三个小时，但一点也没有觉得长，剧情有张有弛却不拖沓，战斗场面枪林弹雨，紧张刺激，扣人心弦。虽说也有煽情之处，但为数不多，且情真意切，铁铮铮的汉子光荣牺牲，怎能不感人泪下？
想要的太多了反而有点四不像和松散，但，战士们真的太可敬，心疼，感恩，感谢
值得票价的良心电影，就是电影院冷气太足片子太长，一度十分渴望毛毯和大床
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
